Compare
runnerhut vs GitHub-hosted runners
The default runners built into GitHub Actions. Zero setup, billed per minute against your GitHub plan, with larger runners and native arm64 available on paid tiers.
What GitHub-hosted runners does well
- Zero configuration — nothing to install, nothing to trust
- Billing already consolidated on your GitHub invoice
- Native arm64 and larger runner sizes on paid plans
- Backed by GitHub's own support and status page
Where we differ
- Roughly twice the per-minute price of runnerhut on every OS
- No EU-only residency for Actions compute, cache and logs — GitHub is a US-headquartered Microsoft subsidiary
- Cache is capped at 10 GB per repository and evicted aggressively
- Cache restore is throttled — large caches often take minutes
- Standard runners use shared vCPU with noisy-neighbour variance
- Docker layer cache has to be rebuilt or shipped to a registry yourself
- No cross-workflow cache sharing and no cache analytics
| GitHub-hosted runners | runnerhut | |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Linux minute | $0.0080 | $0.0040 — 50% less |
| EU-only data residency | Not offered for Actions compute | Six EU regions |
| Setup | None | One line in runs-on |
| Cache size | 10 GB per repo | Unlimited, per org |
| Cache bandwidth | Throttled | 1 GB/s NVMe |
| Docker layer cache | Bring your own | Persistent, automatic |
| arm64 | Paid plans | All plans, 20% cheaper |
| Cross-workflow cache | No | Yes |
| CI analytics | Basic | Per-job cost and duration |
Your next build could be twice as fast, at half the price
Start free. Migrating away is the same one line, and we publish that diff too.
Related
runnerhut vs BlacksmithA YC-backed managed runner platform positioned as a drop-in GitHub Actions replacement, advertising up to 2× faster CI with faster caching and lower cost. Raised a Series B led by Peak XV and is SOC 2 Type 2 compliant.runnerhut vs WarpBuildA hosted runner platform offering Linux, macOS and Windows runners plus bring-your-own-cloud deployments on AWS, GCP and Azure. Advertises roughly 2× faster builds at about half the cost of GitHub-hosted runners.runnerhut vs NamespaceEphemeral compute for CI and development: drop-in GitHub runners alongside devboxes, sandboxes and ephemeral Kubernetes clusters, with Bazel remote execution and egress filtering.runnerhut vs UbicloudAn open-source cloud that runs managed GitHub Actions runners alongside managed Postgres and Kubernetes, competing primarily on price-performance and on being open and portable.